Ekodo: An Ecology of Anger (Part 2) | Happyzine | Because good news makes a difference

Headline »

November 1, 2016 – 7:58 am |

Happyzine has been sold! More information soon …
Ever thought about running a good news website? Here’s your chance.
Happyzine.co.nz has been a force for the positive for the last nine years in New Zealand, sharing good …

Read the full story »
Home » Uncategorized

Ekodo: An Ecology of Anger (Part 2)

Submitted by on September 21, 2010 – 2:55 pm 4 Comments

By Sean Weaver

You can read Part One of this series here.

Imagine a city like Wellington with its transportation, distribution, and communication systems, schools, businesses, hospitals, an airport, café’s, factories, restaurants and supermarkets. Lots of people are getting on with living and working in this interconnected whole. Then imagine that someone wants Wellington to produce something that it does not already produce – say, Persian rugs. And rather than build a Persian rug manufacturing system, they think it easier and more cost effective to gather copies of the Persian rug cottage industry from Iran, and then randomly fire countless numbers of them into Wellington from space.

Booff! One lands in a hospital operating theatre. The doctor performing the operation says “Hey! Piss off!” The little Iranian at the loom does not understand English, smiles and carries on with warp and weft. Pow! Another lands on a construction site beneath the cranes and diggers. The hard hats look at each other in disbelief while a turban-clad weaver scrambles near the concrete truck in his pajamas to find his lost spool of wool and get back to work. A couple of looms land on the motorway causing mayhem, with speeding cars suddenly confronted with a gaggle of rug-bearing workers making neat stacks in the second lane, while three women in colorful headscarves sing a traditional Parsi song as they manipulate the twine with deft fingers.

This is genetic engineering: There is no way to control the location of transgenes in the host genome. When they fire millions of copies of transgenes into a living genome, genetic engineers disrupt the host DNA in immeasurable ways. If you thought that the world was not interconnected you could be forgiven for thinking that your new protein production systems were not capable of disrupting anything. In fact, there would be no theoretical possibility of disrupting a host genome and so unintended and unpredictable consequences are equally impossible – so why waste good money studying impossible non-target effects of genetic engineering?

Of course – if you don’t look for something, you will not find it. If you do look and find something, and publish your results you might just lose your career as discovered by Dr Arpad Pusztai – then Britain’s leading scientist on lectins (plant proteins) – who inconveniently discovered some unwholesome non-target effects of GM potatoes.

I was involved in almost all of the hearings during the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification in late 2000 (and interviewed Pusztai after he testified), and continued to work on this topic for some time thereafter. I grew increasingly frustrated at the way that the media was falsely portraying the science of genetic modification, and where the scientific elephant in the room was being continually squeezed under a Persian rug.

Suffice it to say that I got somewhat angry with the way the media twisted the issue into a simplistic conflict story of science vs dummies. There were in fact lots of scientists on both sides of this conflict, and I noticed that the key unspoken thing that divided us was different theories of reality. Those supporting commercial release of GMOs tend to be those who assume that the world was really nothing more than a collection of relatively isolated bits and pieces (‘reductionists’ in philosophy of science speak). Those like myself who remain opposed to commercial release are gene ecologists who recognize that if you want a world that is not interconnected you will need to find another planet.

The Royal Commission ignored the gene ecologists and ruled in favor of the reductionists irrespective of the compelling evidence by the ecologists (some of whom were genetic engineers themselves but who would never let a GMO out of the lab).

I decided to harness my wild anger horses, and yoke them into doing some constructive work. So I used their energy to write lots of letters to the papers and to members of Parliament. But I decided to write in a warm and ‘friendly-but-informed’ style knowing that the sweet-sounding squeaky wheel gets higher-grade oil. I wrote one friendly letter to the Minister for the Environment, respectfully asserting my concerns, proposing constructive and conciliatory ways forward, and offered to meet to discuss if there was interest.

The Minister responded very warmly and suggested that we meet for a coffee to discuss the issues. So we caught up for a latté in Kelburn one rainy afternoon. This is very unlikely to have happened if I had expressed my anger and frustration at her in a blaming and pompous letter. It would have just got flicked off to a Parliamentary or Ministry staffer for the usual ministerial reply.

So I got a relaxed, off-guard one-to-one audience with the nation’s Environment Boss. In that meeting I was able to share my view that there is a middle path in this GM policy punch-up, and that recourse to all of the relevant science would provide a sufficient evidence-based mandate for a progressive and responsible policy framework.

The GM policy debate continues to this day, and many of the core issues remain unresolved. But this episode proved to me that there is a certain power in being positive, and writing the kind of kindly letter that I would like to receive if I was an astonishingly busy and stressed minister doing my best for my country.

Sean Weaver is the founder and host of Ekodo – a professional development life-skills programme for compassionate ecowarriors. He lives in Wellington. See the Ekodo Facebook group here.

Sean is also a climate change solutions consultant through his business Carbon Partnership.

GD Star Rating
GD Star Rating

Tags: ,


  • Armin Hanik says:

    Dear Sean

    You really start out with a most colourful and fanciful way to make a person that has no idea what GE is about understand the basic idea.

    I admire you for being able to keep the wild horses of anger in check, and even managing to put them to work.

    However, I’m the type that looks at long term story lines instead of the daily news.

    And for all the goodwill and hard work on , may I say, “our side”,,, not a bloody chance mate.

    If you stop the “West” doing it, the Chinese don’t care.
    If you stop Civilians doing it, the military plays by their own rules.

    Stanislav Lem invented the recoverer, which would be a job tasked with covering up and eradicating dis-coveries.

    And I fear that would be the only way to get to stop some of the current developments.

    I usually liken our situation to sitting in a train that runs with 200k/hr into one direction, and a few of us getting up and saying: Well, this won’t do! And starting to walk inside the train aisle into the other direction…. Sure,,, it’s the right direction. It may be the only thing that is upright and proper to do, it may be the ONLY thing left to do at all.

    But it won’t make a jot of a difference.

    We are inside an explosion, the shit is flying, in my opinion all that is left is to let it run its course and hope there will be some pieces left to be picked up later on.

    Life finds a way. Maybe not with humans in it…..

    And, no, this is not despair. It is accepting the inevitable, like learning to accept death…..

    Just my 5c, man.



    GD Star Rating
    GD Star Rating
  • Sean Weaver says:

    Hi Armin – I loved your comment. Yes I agree there is great momentum running against the flows of nature that cannot be sustained. But I guess I have made my decision to find that flow, embody it as best I can, benefit from it, and harness its energy to soften the landing if and when things go awry.

    I experience ceaseless positive outcomes of relentless kindness, sometimes when things change in response (for the better), sometimes when things do not work out. But for me the point is not so much the outcome but the path itself. Like the person holding the vine dangling from a cliff with a tiger circling below and a black mouse and a white mouse gnawing at the vine above – there are flowers growing on that cliff that are worth noticing. And human existence (like the existence of all species) must come to an end with extinction. But this is only a problem if we think we are only this single isolate self, or this single isolated species. In an interconnected world we are also the tiger and the mice. Roarrr!

    From a practical short-term point of view though, my experience is that it is worth persevering, because it embodies an adaptive response by a mind that is awake to what is wholesome. Like the immune system that soldiers on relentlessly ignoring any claim that it is a waste of time, we continue with what we cannot help doing because it is in our nature to heal the Earth and help alleviate suffering.

    From time to time circumstances change and it pays off in the short term, as it did with the West Coast forests campaign. In that situation we were up against an awesome force with no sense of relent. But we persevered because we were compelled, and what’s more we loved doing it, and loved each other’s company. But then an election happened and the entire game changed in an instant. We were pre-adapted for the new circumstances and without any further effort a new government did our work for us and the forests were protected.

    I am confident that conditions will change in the coming years and those of us doing this compassionate work will find it worthwhile. It may be another generation, but whatever the positive result, and no matter how small, our on-going efforts will help bring it into being. If this can reduce the numbers who suffer by only half a percent, then for me at least it is worth doing. That half a percent will not know who to be grateful for in the same way that I do not know my past benefactors either…

    …my 5c worth …


    GD Star Rating
    GD Star Rating
  • Rimu says:

    I bet in the 19th Century many people felt that the struggle for a 8 hour work-day was futile and that the men with money and ‘human nature’ (as it was understood then) on their side would win in the end…

    GD Star Rating
    GD Star Rating
  • Nigel says:

    @Armin – see this post at Clicklocal regarding why we have realistic cause for optimism:


    Cheers – nigel

    GD Star Rating
    GD Star Rating

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also Comments Feed via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.